<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brian Edwards Media &#187; Jonathan Milne</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brianedwardsmedia.co.nz/tag/jonathan-milne/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brianedwardsmedia.co.nz</link>
	<description>A sense of humour is just common sense dancing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2018 02:58:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Semantics Perhaps, but Important</title>
		<link>http://brianedwardsmedia.co.nz/2017/09/semantics-perhaps-but-important/</link>
		<comments>http://brianedwardsmedia.co.nz/2017/09/semantics-perhaps-but-important/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2017 06:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BE]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Milne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Joyce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianedwardsmedia.co.nz/?p=9959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a dodgy piece of journalism in yesterday&#8217;s Sunday Star Times, entitled &#8216;The cynical art of the cheap apology&#8217;, Jonathan Milne castigated Finance Minister Steven Joyce for his most recent defence of his claimed $11.7 billion &#8216;fiscal hole&#8217; in Labour&#8217;s campaign promises. Milne wrote: &#8216;Challenged to explain his discredited calculations, Joyce took the art of [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a dodgy piece of journalism in yesterday&#8217;s Sunday Star Times, entitled &#8216;The cynical art of the cheap apology&#8217;, Jonathan Milne castigated Finance Minister Steven Joyce for his most recent defence of his claimed $11.7 billion &#8216;fiscal hole&#8217; in Labour&#8217;s campaign promises.</p>
<p>Milne wrote: &#8216;Challenged to explain his discredited calculations, Joyce took the art of the cheap apology to a new low. &#8220;Well I&#8217;m sorry,&#8221; he said, &#8220;but&#8230; they&#8217;re accurate.&#8221;&#8216;</p>
<p>&#8216;And with that, New Zealand&#8217;s finance minister devalued the word &#8220;sorry&#8221; further than he or his predecessors have ever taken the New Zealand dollar.&#8217;</p>
<p>Now here&#8217;s the problem: when Joyce responds &#8216;Well I&#8217;m sorry&#8230; but they&#8217;re accurate,&#8217; to the accusations about there being a fiscal hole in his calculations, he isn&#8217;t apologising for the calculations, he&#8217;s simply being polite. His apology is for disagreeing with the questioner or commentator.</p>
<p>We all do it:</p>
<p>&#8216;Well I&#8217;m sorry, I don&#8217;t care what it cost, I really don&#8217;t like that hat.&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8216;Well I&#8217;m sorry, you can argue till the cows come home, but I still think Edwards is an idiot.&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8216;Well I&#8217;m sorry, if that&#8217;s art, I&#8217;m a Dutchman!&#8217;</p>
<p>In every case the &#8216;sorry&#8217; indicates an apology for disagreeing with someone else&#8217;s position. It&#8217;s not a mea culpa.</p>
<p>Challenged to defend his calculations, Joyce&#8217;s &#8216;Well I&#8217;m sorry&#8217; wasn&#8217;t an apology for those calculations, but a common way of prefacing disagreement with something said.</p>
<p>It scarcely deserved the headline: &#8216;The cynical art of the cheap apology&#8217;.</p>
<p>Semantics perhaps, but important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brianedwardsmedia.co.nz/2017/09/semantics-perhaps-but-important/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
